Paedophile Priest’s Suspension Lifted by Catholic Church
The Freethinker
The Roman Catholic church has lifted the suspension of a Tamil Nadu priest convicted last year of sexually assaulting a 14 year-old girl in the US more than a decade ago. The suspension of Rev Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, above, was lifted after the bishop of the Ootacamund Diocese in Tamil Nadu consulted with church authorities at the Vatican, said Rev Sebastian Selvanathan, a spokesman for the diocese. Bishop Arulappan Amalraj of Ootacamund (Ooty) had referred Jeyapaul’s case to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the suspension was lifted on the church body’s advice, he added. The Vatican declined immediate comment. Jeyapaul was sent to Minnesota in 2004. He was suspended in 2010 after being charged with sexually assaulting two girls who were both 14 at the time. Arrested in 2012, Jeyapaul pleaded guilty to molesting one of the teenagers who hasn’t been identified publicly. Earlier this month, it was widely reported that Catholic bishops were being told in a new training course that they were not obliged to report cases of abuse committed by priests to the authorities. Here, for example, is one report from Times Live in South Africa. The Catholic League’s Bill Donohue is now claiming that all the reports “distorted” the facts. A statement by one French monsignor during a training course for new bishops is being interpreted by some major media outlets as if it were an official Vatican document. It is nothing of the sort. In a presentation that he made to some bishops, he contended that the clergy were not required to report suspected abuse cases to the authorities. That, however, was his opinion, and nothing more. Most of these erroneous reports cited Crux journalist John Allen as their source. He wrote a splendid piece about Msgr. Tony Anatrella’s words to the new bishops. Nowhere, however, did Allen claim that Anatrella’s words amounted to a new Vatican policy or a ‘Vatican document’. That didn’t stop major media outlets, however, from making such an unfounded leap. UPI, under the headline, ‘Vatican: Bishops not required to report abuse’, declared that ‘A newly released Catholic church document tells bishops they don’t have to report clerical child abuse accusations to the police’. The Guardian cited Allen, but then went far beyond his Crux article in claiming that Anatrella’s words amounted to ‘the Catholic church’s policy’. Newsweek ran a Reuters article that claimed, ‘The Vatican has told new Catholic bishops that they have no obligation to report clerical child abuse, according to reports’. And Time also distorted Allen’s article, saying Crux was reporting a ‘policy’ in which ‘The Catholic Church is allegedly telling newly-ordained bishops that they have no obligation to report child sexual abuse allegations to law enforcement officials’. Allen correctly said that the monsignor’s presentation may have been ‘seriously wanting’ in some areas, but he never went beyond that. As Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi subsequently made clear, Anatrella’s words were ‘not in any way – as someone has mistakenly interpreted – a new Vatican document or a new instruction or new ‘guidelines’ for bishops’. John Allen is not responsible for the irresponsible conclusions drawn by others.
|
.
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.